Memo

Dear Terebro Energy Company: The requirement for EG Consulting not to cheat on the source of technical data is against company policy. It would be defile to do as requested and wouldnt serve the stakeholders in such(prenominal) legislation. It would be best to provide accurate information to tolerate the setting of a safe limit to fracking near dry land water sources. The Legislature will implement this information to twist legislation. The citizens will vote with this information in mind. Engineers and oil fabrication professionals will call this data in the field. The story of EG Consulting, not to mention, my own standing in the field rests on the verity of the report. Its in the best interest of EG Consulting and Terebro Energy Company to practice as many sources of data as possible to break-dance away an accurate and strong report that all stakeholders dope confide on. I think it is best for us to compromise and use other sources to support this claim.< br/>
If your information is accurate, then to take away a second opinion could never hurt. To prevent injure to the number of my company and my client is my primary objective. If your proposed distance of 750 feet turns prohibited to be inaccurate, then damage will not just now be inflicted on the water table, but also would damage the reputation of Terebro Energy Company and EG Consulting as well as the arouse legislature. Thank you for your time and consideration. Feel free to signature me if you have any questions or concerns.If you want to get a in effect(p) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper