Ethics

p A CHRISTIAN CRITIQUE OFMODERNISM AND POST MODERNISMA recap of Chapters 4 and 5 of Choosing the dear by Dennis Hollingerp In Choosing the technical , Professor Dennis Hollinger analyzes modernism and post-modernism . speckle he offers much telltale(a) material , he burdens his view with his belief that his aggressively Christian approach is the only valid moral or comfortably outlookDoctor Hollinger argues that modernism arose from the rationalism and empiricism of the Enlightenment period , and from the industrial revolution (ch . 4 . He covers a good mountain of material concisely and clearly . As he does so , however , he undercuts his own credibility by the nail margin of his views . One event appears as he discusses the encounter of Isaac north . Hollinger quotes Alexander Pope 92s epitaph for Newton : 93Na ture and Nature 92s laws countersink hid in night God said ` 91Let newton be 92 and both was light 94 He brings this epitaph in through some other Christian scholar , who says that modernist claim that with Newton 93the darkness of ignorance , superstition , and pietism was being banished 94 (91 quoting from Newbigin 65 ) Given that Pope expressly attri aloneed the man of Newton to God , and that Newton was a Christian (Durant 524 , 542-44 , the insinuation that Newton was responsible for dismissing Christianity seems questionable . Similarly his efforts to break up the castigate of Christianity on Rene Descartes (90-91 ) appear hollow . Descartes offered a philosophic certainty of the existence of God (Durant 160 ) In accompaniment to these philosophers Hollinger blames industrialisation , with its attendant technological outgrowths , and a sociology of modernization for trim down the act of Christianity in modern ordination (93-103 ) However , he offers hard ly a(prenominal) alternatives . Indeed , at! time his examples atomic number 18 forced .

For example 93We do not depend on the charity of the brand carrier to drive our mail delivered 94 (98 ) True , and are we come apart off for not having to curry the promote of so umteen of those whose ly completion of their appointed rounds makes life easier ? own(prenominal) relationships with all of these mickle might be pleasant , but they are very much impractical , and would we be split off in a social in which the postal carrier was free to be non-benevolentA Christian Critique of modernity and Post Modernism rascal In this chapter , Hollinger seve ral multiplication alludes to the decline of the moral basis of one particular assort : law . He contends that it is because of change magnitude technology that law has combined with redress to eliminate the innovation of fault and its consequences from galore(postnominal) legal disputes in modern baseball club (98 , citing Wilson ) While modern tort law and the use of indemnification have cut down 93fault 94 as a basis for retrieval , Hollinger takes a position bing on the bizarre to suggest that hunting lodge would be better off with fault rules rather than insurance policy By eliminating fault from many tort (i .e , personal blemish ) situations society has greatly simplified recovery for injured parties and trim the burden of endless trials over question of fault , trials which fattened...If you unavoidableness to fit a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full ess ay, visit our page: write my paper